You are here
Understanding timeframes for the Comparable Overseas Bodies process for registered complementary medicines, assessed listed medicines and substances in listed medicines
Guidance explaining how the Comparable Overseas Bodies report-based process is associated with shortened evaluation timeframes for applications.
Recently published
This page was published on [date_placeholder].
Recently updated
This page was updated on [date_placeholder]. See page history for details.
Purpose
The COB report-based process is associated with shortened evaluation timeframes. The aim of this process is to:
- encourage harmonisation and sharing of knowledge
- reduce TGA duplication of evaluations undertaken by COBs, while still maintaining existing quality, safety and efficacy standards for medicines supplied in Australia
- allow applications following the COB report-based process to have shorter evaluation timeframes.
The intention is that the TGA will only need to evaluate data generated specifically for the Australian context (for example, Australian labels). However, in some instances, additional data may need to be considered (for example, to address data gaps or additional safety data generated since the COB evaluation report approval).
Legislation
Timeframes and milestones
Regulations 16GH and 16GI of the Therapeutic Goods Regulations 1990 provide legislated timeframes for the evaluation of applications for registered complementary medicines, assessed listed medicines and substances for use in listed medicines. The evaluation phase timeframe varies depending on the application category selected and the extent to which the COB report removes the need for the TGA to evaluate data. Timeframes associated with the different application types vary as follows:
Application category | Application type | Screening (days) | Total Evaluation time (days) |
---|---|---|---|
IN1 | Sole use of COB reports and/or monograph from a default standard | 40 | 70 |
IN2 | Mixed evaluation | 40 | 120 |
IN3 | Mixed evaluation | 40 | 150 |
IN4 | Full independent evaluation | 40 | 180 |
L(A)2 | Sole use of COB reports | 40 | 60 |
L(A)3 | Full independent evaluation | 40 | 150 |
RCM2 | Sole use of COB reports | 40 | 64 |
RCM3 | Mixed evaluation | 40 | 150 |
RCM4 | Mixed evaluation | 40 | 170 |
RCM5 | Full independent evaluation | 40 | 210 |
Page history
Minor update to table.
Original publication.
Minor update to table.
Original publication.